A Century of Methodological Individualism Part 1 : Schumpeter and Menger
نویسنده
چکیده
2009 marks the centenary of methodological individualism (MI). The phrase was first used in English in a 1909 QJE paper by Joseph Schumpeter. Yet after 100 years there is considerable confusion as to what the phrase means. MI is often invoked as a fundamental description of the methodology both of neoclassical and Austrian economics, as well as other approaches, from New Keynesianism to analytical Marxism. However, the methodologies of those to whom the theoretical practice of MI is ascribed differ profoundly on the status of the individual economic agent, some adopting a holistic and some a reductionist standpoint. The purpose of the research of which this paper is part is to uncover and evaluate some of the meanings of the phrase methodological individualism (MI). This first paper considers the contributions of Joseph Schumpeter, who was the first to use the term, and of Carl Menger, considered by many to be the founder of MI. The approach adopted is to apply the intellectual apparatus developed in Denis (2004) to the arguments of these writers. This constitutes a test of that apparatus: is it able to clarify the standpoints to which it is applied? The conclusion reached is that both Schumpeter and Menger adopt a reductionist ontology in the sense of Denis (2004). Methodological Individualism, (1909-2009), Part 1 Andy Denis Page 2 of 16
منابع مشابه
Paths of the Weberian–Austrian Interconnection
This paper centers on the theoretical–methodological interconnections between Weber and the Austrian economists. First, the influence of classical Austrian economics, especially Menger and Böhm-Bawerk, on Weber is reexamined. Then we are concerned with the importance of Weber’s ideas in neoclassical Austrian economics, including Schumpeter, Mises and Hayek. Also, Weber’s legacy in modern econom...
متن کاملThe Austrian School of Economics 1 By :
This paper presents an overview of the Austrian school of economics. Even though it started with Carl Menger and the intellectual circle in 19 century Vienna, its theoretical and philosophical roots go far back to the Scholastics and even the Greeks starting with Socrates (469-399 B.C.), Plato (427-347 B.C.), Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) and later John Locke (1632-1704), Richard Cantillon (1680-173...
متن کاملThe Marxian transformation problem revisited
In the 20 century there was an unbridgeable gap between the “right” and “left” schools of economics with respect to the determination of value of commodities. While Marxian scholars insisted, that human labour being the essence of value to have a good argument for demonstrating exploitation, mainstream economists in the West focused on marginal utility theory to keeping up their basic axiom of ...
متن کاملNominalism and Systemism: On the Non-Reductionist Nature of Methodological Individualism
This paper investigates the systemic nature of methodological individualism. According to widespread belief, the notion of autonomy of the actor that is defended by methodological individualism is mistaken because it is incompatible with the study of society in terms of its organized structure. We argue that this viewpoint must be rejected. In our opinion, it stems from confusion between ontolo...
متن کامل